BMC ACQUIRES NUMARA,
BMC announced its acquisition of Numara Software, signaling its intent to enter the mid-market segment and offer SaaS and IT management solutions for Global 100 to small and medium businesses.
On Jan 30, BMC announced a definitive agreement to acquire Numara Software.
But first, a historical flashback:

Back in 2004, BMC acquired Magic Solutions’ help desk management software (to enter — that’s right! — into the mid-market segment) and renamed it as its own BMC service desk express suite. For Magic customers, the costs went up, even as the ship went down.
ACQUISITION COSTS PAID BY CUSTOMERS
Marimba followed in the wake of Magic. Its configuration management software was integrated into BMC's Remedy line of customer support and network management software. BMC buried the Marimba name shortly thereafter.
Fast-forward to 2012 and watch History Repeat Itself on the BMC channel!

Sequels are so predictable. Numara products will become more and more expensive as BMC tries to recoup the acquisition costs from its newly expanded customer base. In the not-too distant future, Numara customers will be finding the price increases nudging them towards the more complicated BMC Service Management (Remedy) solution — which may or may not provide the service they need, at the price they want to pay.
There is another way…
GET ON BOARD WITH SERVICEDESK PLUS AND PAY NOTHING FOR THE FIRST YEAR.
Trade in your Numara Proof of Purchase and get an equivalent ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus annual license for free*. Yes, you read it right, absolutely free with no hidden catch.
Know more | Trade in your Numara Proof of Purchase here |
You can also email your proof of Purchase to swap@manageengine.com
Switch before it is too late.

*Numara is a registered trademark of Numara Software, Inc. All other product and company names mentioned herein may be the trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.
Arvind Parthiban
.jpg)
When an end user sends a request, he always expects it to be considered as High priority. Even if it is a minor issue, it is a High Priority one, in his terms. I always suggest my clients to carefully design the Requester's Incident Form in the Self-Service Portal in such a way that the Requesters do not drive the workflow of the ticket. Here are few thoughts on what inputs should be gathered from the form,
Fields which should definitely be in the requesters incident form,
Fields which should not be in the requesters incident form,
Configure SLAs based on priority
ServiceDesk Plus allows you to configure SLA based on many available criteria, however it is highly recommended to configure SLAs based on Priority. It is always easier to classify any ticket (irrespective of the type, category, and requester) based on the priority. This way, you can classify all your incoming requests with fewer SLAs and set up the due by time as per your environment's acceptance level. Now this raises the question, how to assign the right priority to each ticket? To address this, we have come up with a feature called Priority Matrix.
Define your Priority automatically using Priority Matrix.
You can define the Priority of any incident based on the Impact that incident has created in the organization and the Urgency in which the ticket should be resolved. For those who need clarification on Urgency & Priority, here is a scenario for explanation. Consider a payroll server down on say Jan 5th & the same server being down on Jan 27th . In this case, the urgency to resolve the ticket is higher on Jan 27th as it is towards the end of the month and needs to be addressed immediately compared to Jan 5th when the payroll usage is minimum. Depending on the Urgency, the Priority of the ticket raised on Jan 27th is Higher.

ServiceDesk Plus allows the End User or the Technician to define Impact & Urgency based on which, the Priority Matrix will automatically sets the Priority. This way, the SLA too can be set based on the Priority Matrix.
It is better to automate the SLA based on Priority Matrix (Impact and Urgency) than letting end users define the SLA.
Arvind Parthiban
A Day in the Life of a Change Manager: A Perspective for Service Desk Professionals | August Webinar
.
Tuesday,
August 16th
1:00 - 2:00 PM Eastern
12:00 - 1:00 PM Central
11:00 AM - 12:00 PM Mountain
10:00 AM - 11:00 AM Pacific
A Day in the Life of a Change
Manager: A Perspective for Service Desk Professionals
With Glenn LeClair, CMC & Arvind Parthiban, Sponsored By ManageEngine, ServiceDesk Plus
Register Now!
.........................................................................................
.The change process is often a “Black Box” to many front line service professionals. The change decisions that are made greatly impact the workload of support staff and the quality of services provided. This webinar is intended to de-mystify change management and offer a perspective for service desk managers by examining the normal activities and challenges of a change manager.
Moving beyond the basics of ITIL theory, Glenn will guide you down daily events that include:
By the end of the session, you should have a clear understanding of how the process can work to help you, and what rights and obligations come for service desk managers with a "seat at the CAB table."
About Our Presenter:
Glenn
LeClair is an experienced, "hands on" consultant and former change
manager. As a Certified Management Consultant (CMC) he has been an active
practitioner in a variety of fields for 20 years. For the last 12 years he has
been focused on the domains of ITIL and IT service management and is a
certified instructor and v3.0 Expert. He is a graduate of Trent University and
holds an honors degree in policy studies. He is a former member of the faculty
of Humber College, and an author of several ITIL and IT governance
publications. Glenn is also a consultant in the field of service management, a
former director of management consulting with DMR/Fujitsu Consulting and former
senior consultant with Hewlett-Packard Canada.
Member Price: FREE
Non-Member Price: FREE
Register Now!
Arvind Parthiban
ServiceDesk Plus
I
know most of you are using ServiceDesk Plus in the right way, however
in few of our customer environments I found certain features are used
improperly. So I have started a series of tips & tricks blogs to use
ServiceDesk Plus features efficiently. Here's one example where tickets were merged in place of implementing Problem Management.
Merging Tickets
When to merge a ticket?
The purpose of merging tickets is to avoid duplicate entries. When a requester raises a request twice for the same incident, the two tickets can be merged.
Here's a scenario: A requester, say Bob, sends an email to the help desk for his laptop problem. He then calls the help desk to reconfirm the logging of this incident and the help desk creates another ticket for the same issue. The duplicate tickets fall under these conditions,
When the above condition occurs, the tickets can be merged and the rest of the tickets/conversation will be continued as a conversation thread under one ticket.
What not to merge?
In the same scenario, if multiple requesters report the same issue, do not merge them. If tickets from many requesters are merged, then only one requester will be emailed and the records will be tied only to the parent request. These multiple incidents can be analyzed and moved to Problem Management, if necessary.

"The
primary goal of Problem Management is to reduce adverse impacts caused
by incidents and to avoid the recurrence of problems related to these
incidents."
Consider a scenario where a "wi-fi not connecting" incident is
reported. The technician suggests basic troubleshooting tips to resolve
the issue. However, over a period of time, the incident occurs again and
again. To eliminate this issue permanently, the root cause of the
incident is to be found and resolved. A problem involving a group of
incidents should be created for this purpose and assigned to an
appropriate technician.
Rules of engagement for Problem Management:
Add your doubts/ interested modules in which you are looking for more tips & best practices, so we can blog more about these tips & tricks of ServiceDesk Plus.
Use ServiceDesk Plus efficiently and help us help you.
Arvind
In recent times all consultants, ITSM courses, blogs have been buzzing the term "Service Catalog". They suggest you to start implementing ITIL in your environment with a simple Service Catalog. But the question is "Is Service Catalog really that simple to start with?" For those who don’t know about SC, it is like a menu card for IT department telling the users what services are offered to them, how soon it can be delivered and the process to deliver it.
So, when is the right time to implement Service Catalog?
Service Catalog is not a module to start your ITIL expedition with. You need the basic building blocks to be implemented first. In my opinion, you definitely need the Incident Management and Change Management in place before you proceed with the Service Catalog.

Packaging your work is as important as the work itself.
Service
Catalog
helps you to organize the offered services that are specific to
the user requirements. It also provides clarity & visibility about
your IT operations to your end user and sets the right expectation on
the
delivery time of the service. Service Catalog also takes care of the
work flow process right from approval to implementation of each
service.
In short, Service Catalog gives your IT a new face. I would say that
Service Catalog is definitely a necessity
for those who have the basic processes in place - adopt Service Catalog
now and do not play the catch-up game later. And for those who do not have
Incident and Change management, Service Catalog is only a luxury.